Four confirmations his awareness of prejudice. He bursts, accusing the others of being crazy. He lashes out against the accused kid because he cannot lash out against his own son from whom he is estranged. If the jury finds a "reasonable doubt Every person may have his own way of defining the term "reasonable doubt.
After questioning his sanity they hastily decide to humor the juror 8 Henry Fonda by agreeing to discuss the trial for one hour. Four thinks each person is responsible for his actions regardless of his situation, but Eleven understands the negative impacts of mistreatment.
He brings up their testimony that they heard the father hit the boy and the boy walk out. As addressed above as isolation from other groups, organizations can be susceptible to unethical decisions based on their inability to create dialogue with impacted stakeholders.
Eleven of the jurors immediately vote guilty; only Juror No. His utilization of the above concepts began to create an environment in which others felt comfortable in participating in the constructive dialogue.
Juror Twelve complains about the heat in the room, saying that his taxes are so high they ought to cover air conditioning.
His outburst has caused quite a disturbance in the room. He levels with the others by openly admitting that he does not know if the boy killed his father and solicits feedback in order to make an accurate decision.
Active Themes Juror Seven nervously offers gum to the men at the water cooler and makes idle chat.
The jury encounters many difficulties in learning to communicate and deal with each other. Nine reacts emotionally to the idea that only some people get to define what truth is, or who can be trusted.
Kouzes and Posner further this idea: Unfortunately, leaving our prejudices outside the court room door is near impossible.
Later, Nine will further discuss the concepts of truths and lies. It is the size of the unconscious area that will differ more among the men.
Ten, Four, and Five show how their backgrounds influence them to either instinctively believe or distrust the kid. Later, Nine will further discuss the concepts of truths and lies. The character with the largest hidden window is the boy on trial. We will see how the contents of the unconscious area will largely affect the decision making process of some of the jurors.
Their verdict is now a solid not guilty.
This is alluded to in a conversation between juror 7 Jack Warden and himself. The window is an innocent object over which the jurors clash. Later in life, the two are not in touch with each other.
Chaffee tells about deductive reasoning. Juror Five responds by telling of growing up in a slum and playing in a place full of garbage.
You know what I mean. He is unwilling or unable to level with the others and is also unreceptive to any feedback.
Oct 21, · The film, 12 Angry Men, can teach us a lot about the process of group communication – both the positive and negative aspects. This blog post is a brief analysis of the film in relation to group dynamics. If you haven’t seen the film, I highly suggest viewing it.
This is the case with Reginald Rose's 12 Angry Men. In this story, originally published in the 's, the attitudes and beliefs of the jurors can help us reflect upon our own prejudices and.
LitCharts assigns a color and icon to each theme in Twelve Angry Men, which you can use to track the themes throughout the work. 12 Angry Men is a tale of a jury struggling to determine if a young man is guilty of murdering his father.
His life depends on their unanimous decision-either guilty or not guilty.
In the beginning of the movie, we see the a bored-sounding, non-committal judge wearily instructing the twelve-man jury to begin their deliberations after listening. Analysis of 12 Angry Men Essay - The play 12 Angry Men is one of the greatest plays I’ve seen. I read the novel and saw both movies but my favorite was the Broadway play we saw as a class.
The play was so alive and made me really feel like I was in the jury. The play was about a young man on trial for the murder of his father. In viewing 12 Angry Men, we see face to face exactly what man really is capable of being.
We see different views, different opinions of men such as altruism, egoism, good and evil. It is no doubt that human beings possess either one or any of these characteristics, which make them unique. It is safe.Analysis of 12 angry men